Why does structuredClone throw a DataCloneError when cloning a Proxy wrapping a built-in object?

by

Summary

We experienced a production data export failure where a critical service using structuredClone to serialize user session states crashed with DataCloneError. The root cause was an unwrappable exotic object: a Date instance wrapped in a Proxy to track mutation history. While the Date object itself is natively cloneable, the Proxy wrapper prevented the structured cloning algorithm from accessing the underlying [[DateValue]] internal slot. The engine correctly identified the Proxy as an “exotic object”—an object that intercepts operations via internal methods—and rejected it because the standard serialization algorithm does not invoke Proxy traps for property access. The fix required explicitly unwrapping the target object before cloning.

Root Cause

The failure stems from the fundamental design of the structuredClone algorithm versus how JavaScript Proxy objects function.

  1. Internal Slot Access: The structured cloning algorithm operates at a low level, directly inspecting the internal slots of objects (e.g., [[DateValue]] for Dates, [[MapData]] for Maps). It does not perform standard property lookups (like [[Get]]).
  2. Proxy Obscurity: A Proxy is a transparent wrapper. When structuredClone encounters a Proxy, it sees an object of type “Proxy.” It does not automatically “unwrap” it to find the target.
  3. Algorithm Violation: According to the HTML specification (Section 2.8.5), if the input value is not a “cloneable” type (like Object, Array, TypedArray, Date, etc.), the algorithm throws a DataCloneError. A Proxy is not in the list of directly cloneable types, nor does it inherit the type of its target during the initial type check.
  4. No Trap Invocation: Unlike JSON.stringify (which triggers toJSON) or standard property iteration, structuredClone does not trigger Proxy traps like get or getOwnPropertyDescriptor. It requires direct access to the underlying memory structure, which the Proxy explicitly blocks.

Why This Happens in Real Systems

Proxies are frequently used in modern frameworks for Reactivity, Observability, or Access Control.

  • Framework State Management: Libraries (like Vue 3 or MobX) wrap primitives and objects in Proxies to detect changes. If a developer passes a reactive Date object directly to a serialization function (for caching or sending to a Web Worker), the app crashes.
  • Security Layers: Teams often wrap sensitive objects (like configuration or credentials) in Proxies to prevent modification or log access. If these objects need to be cloned for a background process (e.g., a separate thread handling a report), the cloning fails.
  • Immutable Wrappers: Developers sometimes create “frozen” objects using Proxies. While Object.freeze works with structuredClone, a custom Proxy that strictly controls property access can inadvertently break the “enumerability” or “accessibility” of internal slots required by the clone algorithm.

Real-World Impact

  • Service Interruption: In our case, the session serialization service halted immediately, preventing users from saving or exporting their work.
  • Silent Data Corruption Risks: If the error is caught but handled improperly (e.g., falling back to an empty object), users lose data without realizing it.
  • Loss of Performance Benefits: structuredClone supports transferable objects (like ArrayBuffer) where memory is moved rather than copied. A Proxy wrapping a SharedArrayBuffer cannot be cloned, forcing a costly deep copy via serialization or manual iteration, losing the zero-copy advantage.
  • Debugging Difficulty: The error #<Object> could not be cloned is generic. It doesn’t explicitly state “A Proxy cannot be cloned,” leading to hours of debugging the contents of the proxy rather than the wrapper itself.

Example or Code

The following code demonstrates the failure mode. It highlights that structuredClone looks for specific internal slots (like [[DateValue]]) on the object passed, not on the target of a proxy.

// 1. Standard Date: Works
const plainDate = new Date();
const clone1 = structuredClone(plainDate); // Success

// 2. Proxy wrapping Date: Fails
// structuredClone sees a Proxy object, not a Date object.
// It does not check proxyTarget.[[DateValue]].
const proxiedDate = new Proxy(plainDate, {});
try {
    const clone2 = structuredClone(proxiedDate);
} catch (e) {
    console.error(e.name); // DataCloneError
}

// 3. Proxy wrapping a plain Object: Fails
const plainObj = { time: new Date() };
const proxiedObj = new Proxy(plainObj, {});
try {
    const clone3 = structuredClone(proxiedObj);
} catch (e) {
    console.error(e.name); // DataCloneError
}

How Senior Engineers Fix It

The solution depends on whether the Proxy is “transparent” or if it adds necessary logic during access.

  1. Explicit Unwrapping (The “Escape Hatch”):
    If the Proxy is purely for observation or control, access the target explicitly before cloning. This is the safest and most performant method.

    const target = Proxy.revocable({}, {});
// If you know it's a proxy, use .target if available, or maintain a reference to the original.
const safeClone = structuredClone(proxyDate); // Fails
const safeClone = structuredClone(originalDate); // Succeeds

  2. Custom Rehydration:
    If you cannot access the original object, you must intercept the serialization manually to “unwrap” or flatten the data before passing it to structuredClone.

    function cloneReactive(obj) {
    // If it's a proxy, we might need to inspect its properties via standard keys
    // Note: This only works for transparent proxies.
    if (isProxy(obj)) {
         return structuredClone(Object.assign({}, obj));
    }
    return structuredClone(obj);
}

  3. Using Serialization Fallbacks:
    If the goal is to transport data (and not specific object references), JSON.stringify is actually the correct tool for Proxies (with caveats regarding functions/Symbols). However, for maintaining types (like Date), manual rehydration is required.

Why Juniors Miss It

  1. Mental Model of “Transparency”: Junior developers often view Proxies as “invisible” wrappers. They expect structuredClone(proxy) to behave exactly like structuredClone(target) because proxy.method() works that way.
  2. Lack of Spec Knowledge: They do not realize that structuredClone is not a JavaScript runtime function in the standard sense; it is a Structured Serialize algorithm used by the browser (HTML spec). It bypasses JavaScript “get” traps entirely to ensure a predictable, high-performance serialization path.
  3. Over-reliance on JSON.stringify: Since JSON.stringify(proxy) usually works (by coercing the object to a string representation), they assume all standard serialization APIs share this behavior. They fail to realize structuredClone requires structural integrity (internal slots) that JSON ignores.