Solving conflicting react router redirects

by

Summary

The user is experiencing a race condition between the React Router navigate function and the Redux state update triggered by dispatch(logout()). The attempt to navigate to the homepage (/) in Header.jsx is being immediately overridden by the ProtectedRoute component.

When the user clicks “Sign Out” on the /profile page:

  1. navigate("/") is called.
  2. dispatch(logout()) is called, setting isLoggedIn to false.
  3. Because the component re-renders, the ProtectedRoute guarding /profile re-evaluates.
  4. Since isLoggedIn is now false, ProtectedRoute executes return <Navigate to="/login" />.
  5. The router prioritizes the Navigate component from the currently rendered route, sending the user to /login.

Root Cause

The root cause is dependent state evaluation inside a render cycle. The ProtectedRoute component renders its children or a <Navigate> element based purely on the isLoggedIn prop. When the logout action occurs, the component tree re-renders. The ProtectedRoute on the current path (/profile) sees the stale or transitioning state and issues a hard navigation instruction to /login, which happens faster than or conflicts with the imperative navigate("/") call in the event handler.

Why This Happens in Real Systems

This is a classic issue in Single Page Applications (SPAs) that rely on centralized state management (like Redux) combined with declarative routing.

  • Imperative vs. Declarative Conflict: You are mixing an imperative navigation (navigate) in a click handler with declarative navigation (<Navigate>) in a component render.
  • Timing: State updates in React are batched. The navigate("/") and the state update for logout happen in the same tick. However, the re-render of the ProtectedRoute happens immediately after the state update. The <Navigate> component inside that render acts as a “block” that forces the location change.
  • Layout Persistence: The Layout component persists while routes change. If the Header is inside Layout, and you click logout while on a protected route, the Layout (and Header) stays mounted. The Header tries to navigate, but the ProtectedRoute inside the Outlet is fighting for control of the URL.

Real-World Impact

  • Broken User Experience: Users intending to logout and return to the homepage are instead redirected to the login page, creating confusion.
  • Potential Infinite Loops: If the login page also has logic that checks auth state and redirects if logged in, this conflict can cause infinite redirect loops.
  • State Inconsistency: The app might briefly flash the homepage or show conflicting UI states (e.g., briefly seeing the login button while the logout action processes) before settling on the wrong page.

Example or Code

To visualize the conflict, here is the logic flow that causes the failure:

// Header.jsx (The attempt to fix)
function handleLogoutClick() {
  // 1. Imperative navigation attempt
  navigate("/"); 

  // 2. State update that triggers re-render of 
  dispatch(logout()); 
}

// ProtectedRoute.jsx (The culprit)
export default function ProtectedRoute({ children, isLoggedIn }) {
  if (isLoggedIn) {
    return children;
  } else {
    // 3. This component re-renders immediately after logout.
    // It ignores the navigate("/") from step 1 and forces /login.
    return ;
  }
}

How Senior Engineers Fix It

Do not handle navigation in the component that initiates the action. Instead, handle the navigation logic inside the side effect that manages the state change, or inside a dedicated component that watches the auth state.

Option 1: Listen in App.jsx (Cleanest)
Modify the App.jsx to watch the isLoggedIn state. If the user is not logged in but is currently on a protected route (or specifically the profile route), redirect them.

// App.jsx
function App() {
  const isLoggedIn = useSelector((state) => state.auth.isLoggedIn);
  const location = useLocation();

  // If user logs out while on a protected route, redirect to home
  if (!isLoggedIn && location.pathname === '/profile') {
    return ;
  }

  // ... rest of your router logic
}

Option 2: The “Post-Logout” Redirect (Best UX)
Remove the navigate("/") from the Header. Let the ProtectedRoute do its job (redirect to login), but modify the ProtectedRoute to remember where the user came from, or simply accept that the logout flow lands on Login. If you strictly want to go Home:

  1. In Header: Just dispatch(logout()).
  2. In App.jsx (or a wrapper): Check if !isLoggedIn. If true, render a <Navigate to="/" />.

Option 3: Fixing ProtectedRoute (Long-term robustness)
Update ProtectedRoute to redirect to Home if the user is logged in, but that doesn’t solve the logout case.

Recommended Fix for your specific issue:
Remove navigate("/") from handleLogoutClick. Add logic to redirect to home if the user lands on login while already logged out, but usually, on logout, users expect to see a “Logged out” state or the homepage. The simplest architectural change is to let the App root handle the “Logged out” redirection.

// App.jsx
// Add a catch-all for unauthenticated users trying to access protected areas
// OR an effect that watches auth state changes.

Why Juniors Miss It

  1. Procedural Thinking: Juniors often treat React components like standard HTML/JS scripts. They assume navigate() will execute immediately and nothing else will happen. They fail to account for the reactive render cycle that happens immediately after state changes.
  2. Ignoring Component Lifecycle: They don’t realize that ProtectedRoute is a living component that re-evaluates its return value every time props change. They think of it as a one-time check.
  3. State/Route Coupling: They often tightly couple route definitions to auth logic without creating a global “guard” strategy (like checking auth in App.jsx), leading to conflicting logic between the Header and the ProtectedRoute.