is sharidng worth it with that latency?

by

Summary

This postmortem analyzes the architectural trade-offs in database sharding and proxy-layer query routing. The central issue is managing cross-shard joins with strict latency requirements. We examine whether sharding is worth the complexity for high-scale systems and evaluate strategies like in-proxy hash joins and denormalization. The key takeaway is that sharding introduces unavoidable operational complexity, but it is often essential for horizontal scalability. The challenge lies in balancing this complexity against performance and maintainability.

Root Cause

  • Horizontal Scalability Necessity: When data exceeds single-node capacity, sharding becomes necessary to distribute load.
  • Cross-Shard Join Overhead: Joins across shards require distributed queries, which introduce network latency and coordination complexity.
  • Query Pattern Variability: No single sharding key works for all access patterns, leading to inefficient cross-shard operations.
  • Proxy Layer Overhead: Adding a smart proxy for query routing and result aggregation can increase latency if not optimized.
  • Denormalization Trade-offs: While denormalization can reduce joins, it increases data duplication and update complexity.

Why This Happens in Real Systems

  • Data Growth: Real-world systems experience exponential data growth, forcing horizontal scaling.
  • Read/Write Imbalance: Sharding can help distribute read/write traffic but complicates transactional consistency.
  • Latency Sensitivity: High-scale systems demand low-latency responses, making cross-shard joins expensive.
  • Operational Realities: Managing multiple shards increases deployment, monitoring, and backup complexity.
  • Evolving Query Patterns: Business requirements change, making initial shard keys suboptimal over time.

Real-World Impact

  • Increased Latency: Cross-shard joins add network round-trips and serialization overhead.
  • Operational Overhead: More shards mean more failure points and maintenance tasks.
  • Development Complexity: Developers must handle partial failures and data consistency across shards.
  • Cost Implications: Additional infrastructure for shards and proxies increases hardware and operational costs.
  • Risk of Data Inconsistency: Cross-shard transactions can lead to partial failures and consistency issues.

Example or Code

-- Example: Cross-shard hash join in a proxy layer (pseudo-SQL)
-- Assume two shards: shard_1 (users), shard_2 (orders)
-- Proxy loads smaller table (users) into memory and streams orders

-- Step 1: Fetch users from shard_1 into memory hash map
SELECT user_id, user_name FROM shard_1.users WHERE user_id BETWEEN 1 AND 1000000;

-- Step 2: Stream orders from shard_2 and join in proxy
SELECT o.order_id, u.user_name
FROM shard_2.orders o
JOIN (SELECT user_id, user_name FROM shard_1.users) u
ON o.user_id = u.user_id
WHERE o.order_date > '2023-01-01';

How Senior Engineers Fix It

  • Shard Key Optimization: Choose shard keys that align with dominant query patterns to minimize cross-shard queries.
  • Caching Layers: Use distributed caches (e.g., Redis) to reduce database load and avoid expensive joins.
  • Application-Level Joins: Perform joins in the application layer after fetching data from shards, if feasible.
  • Read Replicas: Offload read traffic to replicas, keeping shards focused on writes.
  • Query Rewriting: Implement proxy-layer query rewriting to avoid unnecessary cross-shard operations.
  • Monitoring and Tuning: Continuously monitor query performance and adjust sharding strategies as needed.

Why Juniors Miss It

  • Over-Engineering: Juniors may design for every possible query pattern, leading to overly complex solutions.
  • Underestimating Latency: Network and serialization overheads are often underestimated in distributed systems.
  • Ignoring Operational Costs: Focus on technical design without considering maintenance and scaling efforts.
  • Lack of Real-World Data: Without experience, it’s hard to gauge actual query patterns and data growth.
  • Premature Optimization: Jumping to advanced techniques like in-proxy joins without exploring simpler alternatives.