Handling text input width and making it responsive

by

Summary

The core problem is a mismatch between a fixed-size CSS container and dynamic user input. The developer used a width: 25vw rule on the input, which is a rigid measurement. When the user enters numbers with many digits, the input container stays the same physical width, but the font size is large. Since text-wrap: wrap is enabled, long numbers are forced to wrap onto a second line or become truncated depending on overflow behavior, effectively hiding them or breaking the layout. The Square-ish Aspect Ratio requirement makes this worse because increasing height to accommodate wrapped text breaks the “squarish” visual design.

Root Cause

The fundamental cause is the use of absolute viewport width units (vw) without managing text overflow. Specifically:

  • Fixed Width Constraint: width: 25vw locks the input element to the viewport size, ignoring the content length.
  • Conflicting Overflow Logic: The use of text-wrap: wrap (usually default for input but explicitly set here) combined with max-width: max-content creates inconsistent browser behavior. Browsers handle input text wrapping differently than div elements; most native input fields do not wrap text visually but scroll it internally.
  • Large Font Size: The font size calc(3rem + 1vh) is substantial. Even a short 5-digit number can exceed 25vw in width, pushing content against the container boundaries.

Why This Happens in Real Systems

This is a classic Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Sizing conflict.

  1. Design Expectation vs. Browser Reality: Design tools like Figma render text with no strict container limits unless explicitly drawn. Browsers, however, strictly enforce parent container dimensions.
  2. Responsiveness Misunderstanding: Developers often use vw (viewport width) thinking it solves responsiveness. However, vw scales with the window, not the content. If the window is small, the input shrinks, and content hides sooner.
  3. Input vs. Div Behavior: Developers often treat <input> like a <div>. A <div> flows naturally; an <input> is a form control that historically prefers clipping or scrolling text to maintain the form’s visual integrity.

Real-World Impact

  • Broken UX: Users cannot see what they are typing once the digit count exceeds the visual width. This leads to input errors in conversion tools.
  • Layout Instability: If text-wrap: wrap actually triggers in the browser (or is forced), the input height will jump, pushing the “Convert” button down and shifting the page layout dynamically.
  • Accessibility Issues: Relying on visual clipping makes the data unreadable for users with zoom enabled or those viewing the page on mobile devices in landscape mode.

Example or Code

To fix this, you must move away from fixed width and allow the input to grow based on content length while maintaining the “squarish” feel.

The Solution:
Replace the fixed width with a dynamic width approach using ch units (character width) or auto sizing, and manage overflow.

CSS Fix (Refined):

input {
  background-color: var(--accent-background--);
  border: 2px solid var(--border-color--);
  border-radius: 5px;
  /* Base size adjustments */
  font-size: calc(3rem + 1vh);
  font-weight: bold;
  text-align: center;

  /* DYNAMIC SIZING LOGIC */
  /* Minimum width (e.g., 5 characters) */
  min-width: 5ch; 
  /* Allow growing, but cap it slightly or let it overflow visually */
  width: auto;
  max-width: 100%; /* Prevent breaking layout */

  /* Removing wrap to allow horizontal scrolling (standard input behavior) */
  white-space: nowrap; 
  overflow-x: auto; /* Allows seeing full number if it gets too long */

  /* Aesthetic tweak to keep it squarish */
  padding: 0.2em 0.5em;
  box-sizing: border-box; /* Critical for padding not to add width unexpectedly */
}

How Senior Engineers Fix It

Senior engineers approach this by defining content constraints before styling:

  1. Use Relative Units: They switch from vw to ch (character width) or em. 1ch equals the width of the character “0”, making it a predictable way to size text inputs.
  2. Handle Overflow Gracefully: They realize input elements are not meant to wrap. Instead of forcing text wrap, they apply overflow-x: auto to allow horizontal scrolling. This keeps the “squarish” shape intact while allowing the user to access all data.
  3. Container Queries (Modern Approach): In advanced setups, they might wrap the input in a container and use Container Queries to adjust font size based on the container width, ensuring the input never exceeds its parent.
  4. Input Validation/Formatting: For unit converters, they often restrict input to numbers only (type="number" with specific step attributes) to prevent accidental text entry that breaks layouts.

Why Juniors Miss It

  • Visual vs. Functional Design: Juniors often focus on the static look in Figma (where text fits perfectly) rather than the dynamic state where a user can type 50 characters.
  • Viewport Units Trap: vw seems like the “magic bullet” for responsiveness, but it ignores the actual content size.
  • Lack of Box Model Awareness: Juniors often forget box-sizing: border-box. Without it, adding padding or borders to a width: 25vw element makes it wider than 25vw, causing unexpected horizontal scrollbars on the page body.
  • Misunderstanding max-content: Applying max-width: max-content to an input can confuse browsers, as inputs are replaced elements or have strict UA styling that overrides this.