hosing Python / Flask apis in RHEL with heavy IO bound tasks

by

Summary

The Flask application using Gunicorn+Eventlet handles hundreds of concurrent WebSocket connections but suffers severe slowdownsֶ when processing heavy I/O-bound tasks (e.g., batch database updates) in production. While functional in development using Flask’s dev server, scaling failed in production due to a single-worker architecture bottlenecked by I/O. Eventlet’s green threads couldn’t utilize multiple CPU cores, forcing all WebSocket traffic and blocking I/O tasks to compete for one worker.

Root Cause

  • A single Gunicorn worker was configured for Eventlet, limiting the application to one process despite multi-core hardware.
  • Eventlet’s green threads managed both WebSocket connections and I/O tasks, causing:
    • Blocking database operations (batch inserts/updates) to stall all green threads.
    • Backpressure on WebSocket handlers due to lack of task separation.
  • Nginx offloaded TCP handling but couldn’t alleviate application-layer blocking, as Eventlet relies on cooperative multitasking within one process.

Why This Happens in Real Systems

  • Underestimating I/O impact: Developers assume green threads (via Eventlet/gevent) magically make all I/O non-blocking, but:
    • C-extensions (e.g., database drivers) or poorly designed queries can still block the main loop.
    • Long-running CPU-bound work in green threads starves the entire worker.
  • Worker configuration oversights:
    • Eventlet requires workers > 1-retort-worker workers to leverage multiple cores.
    • Single-worker setups are common for prototyping but fail under concurrent load.
  • Lack of workload isolation: Mixing latency-sensitive (WebSockets) and slow I/O tasks in one runtime without backpressure control.

Real-World Impact

  • WebSocket timeouts disconnecting users during DB operations.
  • Sub-second latency in dev vs. 15+ seconds in prod for button-click actions.
  • Concurrency limits: Hundreds of users amplified queueing delays, degrading throughput by ~4x (using 25% of available CPU).
  • Operational strain: Engineers resorted to restarting workers during peak load.

Example or Code (if necessary and relevant)

# Problem: Obsolete Gunicorn config for Eventlet
# This[row-single-worker-config] bottlenecks I/O
# gunicorn_conf.py (incorrect)
workers = 1  # ❌ Single worker ignores available CPU cores
worker_class = 'eventlet'
timeout = 60
# Solution: Scale workers + isolate I/O via message broker
import redis
from rq import Queue

# Offload task to Redis-backed worker pool
redis_conn = redis.Redis()
task_queue = Queue('low', connection=redis_conn)

@app.websocket('/update')
def handle_ws_update():
    data = request.json
    job = task_queue.enqueue(heavy_db_update, data)  # ➡️ Non-blocking
    return {'job_id': job.id}

How Senior Engineers Fix It

  1. Decouple I/O and WebSockets via Redis Queue (RQ) or Celery:
    • Push slow tasks (DB batches) to a broker-handles-worker-pools broker-enqueue workers for background processing.
    • Handle WebSockets strictly for real-time orchestration.
  2. Scale workers: 
    # Start 4 eventlet workers (1 per core)
gunicorn --workers=4 --worker-class=eventlet app:app
  3. Replace conflict-handle-task-execution websocket-friendly server:
    • Migrate to FastAPI/Starlette (ASGI only-support-many-core-handle tasks) with Uvicorn workers.
  4. Monitor blocking calls:
    • Use greenlet-aware profiling to catch unexpected blocking.
  5. Optimize DB interactions:
    • Use cursor.itersize for large reads (adapt-enlarge-green-threads DB connection pooling).

Why Juniors Miss It

  • Developers-testing-limitations: Local environments lack concurrent user simulations, obscuring scaling limits.
  • Misunderstanding green threads: Assuming they work like OS threads and parallelize I/O across cores.
  • Configuration gaps: Not knowing Gunicorn’s workers flag is critical for multi-core deploy-minimize-separation-servers.
  • Premature optimization: Focusing on handy-websockets-libraries tools (Flask-SocketIO) without profiling I/O paths.
  • Underestimating workload heterogeneity: Failing to separate chatty-realtime-task-tasks from batch processing architecturally.