C++ std::optional::emplace() rejected by clang, accepted by gcc and msvc

by

Summary

The issue at hand involves a C++ code snippet that utilizes std::optional and its emplace method. Compiler compatibility is a significant concern here, as the code fails to compile with clang 20 but is accepted by gcc and msvc. This discrepancy raises questions about which compiler is correct and why such differences occur.

Root Cause

The root cause of this issue lies in how different compilers interpret the C++ standard, specifically regarding nested classes and constructor access. The error message from clang suggests that it cannot find a suitable constructor for A::B when trying to call b.emplace(). This indicates a potential issue with constructor accessibility or argument deduction.

Why This Happens in Real Systems

This discrepancy happens in real systems due to several factors:

  • Differences in compiler implementations: Compilers like gcc, msvc, and clang might have different interpretations of the C++ standard, leading to varying behaviors.
  • Complexity of the C++ standard: The C++ standard is vast and complex, making it challenging for compilers to implement every feature correctly and consistently.
  • Nested classes and accessibility: The use of nested classes can lead to complexities in constructor accessibility and argument deduction, as seen in this case.

Real-World Impact

The real-world impact of such issues includes:

  • Portability problems: Code that works with one compiler may not work with another, affecting cross-platform development.
  • Debugging challenges: Identifying the root cause of such issues can be time-consuming and may require in-depth knowledge of C++ and compiler specifics.
  • Maintenance and compatibility: Ensuring that code remains compatible across different compiler versions and platforms can be a significant maintenance task.

Example or Code

#include 

class A {
public:
    class B {
    public:
        int i = 0;
        B() = default;
    };
    std::optional b {};
    A() { b.emplace(); } // This line causes the compilation error with clang
};

How Senior Engineers Fix It

Senior engineers would approach this issue by:

  • Consulting the C++ standard: To understand the correct behavior regarding nested classes and std::optional::emplace.
  • Checking compiler documentation: For specific implementation details and known issues related to the compilers in question.
  • Testing with different compiler versions: To see if the issue persists across versions or is specific to a particular version.
  • Filing bug reports: If the issue is deemed a compiler bug, reporting it to the respective compiler teams.

Why Juniors Miss It

Juniors might miss this issue due to:

  • Lack of experience with compiler nuances: Less experienced developers might not be aware of the differences in how various compilers interpret the C++ standard.
  • Insufficient knowledge of C++ standards: Not being familiar with the specifics of nested classes, constructor accessibility, and std::optional can lead to overlooking such issues.
  • Limited debugging skills: Juniors might struggle to identify and diagnose complex issues like compiler discrepancies.
© 2026 Prodopsy